<- Back to featured projects

Draft Case Study

AKS Platform Engineering

Application squads need a secure, standardized Kubernetes platform with faster onboarding and operational guardrails.

AKSKubernetesHelmPlatform Engineering

Problem

Application squads need a secure, standardized Kubernetes platform with faster onboarding and operational guardrails.

Architecture

Draft architecture uses AKS, ingress patterns, workload identity, and centralized observability.

IngressPlatformNamespacesTelemetry
Sanitized AKS platform topology with shared services and tenant workloads.

Reference/proposed architecture diagram for portfolio demonstration. Not a client production architecture.

Architecture Explorer

AKS Platform Engineering: Standardized platform foundations with team namespace autonomy.

Proposed

Data flow: Ingress and platform controls route traffic to tenant namespaces while shared telemetry captures platform health.

Accessible alternative: use the component buttons below to inspect architecture details without zoom.

Legend

  • Ingress / Trigger
  • Orchestration
  • Data / Storage
  • Security
  • Observability
  • Operations
  • Ingress Layer -> AKS Platform Core (traffic)
  • AKS Platform Core -> Tenant Namespaces (scheduling)
  • AKS Platform Core ~> Platform Telemetry (platform signals)
  • Tenant Namespaces ~> Platform Telemetry (workload signals)
  • Secrets Store -> Tenant Namespaces (secret material)

Component Details

Ingress Layer

Entry point for workload traffic.

Responsibilities: Routing | Ingress policy

Security controls: Controlled ingress rules

Dependencies: AKS Platform Core

Design decisions: Enforce consistent ingress patterns across product teams.

Security

Draft security includes network segmentation, policy enforcement, and runtime scanning controls.

Verified Outcomes

  • Draft: improved consistency in Kubernetes deployment practices.
  • Draft: clearer ownership boundaries between platform and product teams.

Design Decisions

  • Use platform-level guardrails with team-level namespace autonomy.
  • Prefer workload identity and policy enforcement for secure service integration.
  • Adopt Helm-based golden paths for repeatable team onboarding.

Implementation

  • Define namespace, ingress, and deployment standards for shared platform operations.
  • Create onboarding templates for services, including observability and policy defaults.
  • Integrate platform diagnostics and operational dashboards for incident triage.

Trade-offs

  • Platform standards reduce variance but can limit unconventional workload patterns.
  • Operational maturity requirements increase initial team onboarding effort.

Engineering Evidence

Reference architecture evidence

Architecture Evidence

Diagram classification: Proposed

Sanitized data flow: Ingress and shared platform controls route workloads to namespaces while centralized telemetry captures platform and workload signals.

Diagram source id: aks-platform-engineering

Evidence pending: no implemented demo route is linked for this case study.

Automated Tests and Results

  • Diagram validation and explorer rendering

    tests/architecture-explorer.test.ts

Latest test run (2026-09-26): Evidence pending: add executable modules and targeted tests for this case study.

Command: No case-study-specific automated tests are currently implemented for this architecture draft.

Latest build run (2026-09-26): Portfolio build passes, but this case study still lacks project-specific implementation artifacts.

Command: node_modules/.bin/next.cmd build

Limitations and Verification Gaps

  • No AKS platform module code, policy definitions, or deployment manifests are committed for this case study.
  • No cluster-level conformance, reliability, or security test artifacts are available.

Evidence Pending

  • Add AKS platform implementation artifacts (Helm, manifests, policy definitions) and associated tests.
  • Add reproducible environment setup instructions for cluster simulation or local validation.

Evidence Status

  • Local checks: Architecture/content checks only.
  • CI checks: Repository lint/type/build checks available.
  • Azure deployment: Not performed / Evidence pending.

Reproduction and Dependencies

Dependencies

  • Node.js (current project uses Next.js 16.x, React 19.x, TypeScript 6.x)
  • npm install
  • Local binaries under node_modules/.bin for lint/typecheck/test/build

Reproduction steps

  1. npm install
  2. Review architecture model in lib/architecture-explorer-data.ts
  3. Open the project case-study route and inspect Architecture Explorer
  4. Implementation evidence requires source modules and automated tests specific to this case study